Can Manchesterism pass the National Scalability Test?

MUCH political coverage around Labour focuses on the froth of personalities, positioning and leadership speculation.

A more useful question is: how would the party actually govern under Andy Burnham?

One clue comes from The Productive State: A Framework for Manchesterism, published by Labour group Mainstream, which is said to work closely with him.

The framework sets out a vision built around:

• Greater devolution of power
• Stronger regional leadership
• Public control of essential services
• Democratic reform
• Wealth taxation

Supporters argue that Greater Manchester demonstrates how devolved powers can support economic growth and public service reform.

Having worked in news journalism, I spent years observing how political stories are selected, framed and debated. I later moved into digital business, where success is usually judged less by narrative and more by outcomes, evidence and scalability.

I have two questions:

1. How much of Greater Manchester’s success can genuinely be attributed to any policies that are promoted under ‘Manchesterism’?

2. If those policies have contributed to success across the city region, can they be scaled effectively across the UK?

To me, they are simple questions. The answers tho’ are more complex – and they matter more than the daily political theatre.

Answers below please …

This entry was posted in Economics, Leadership. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.